<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2024 U.S. Presidential Election Lap Book	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://researchparent.com/2024-u-s-presidential-election-lap-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://researchparent.com/2024-u-s-presidential-election-lap-book/</link>
	<description>Educational Learning Materials for Parents and Teachers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2024 15:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Michelle		</title>
		<link>https://researchparent.com/2024-u-s-presidential-election-lap-book/#comment-271027</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Nov 2024 15:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://researchparent.com/?p=26152#comment-271027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://researchparent.com/2024-u-s-presidential-election-lap-book/#comment-270630&quot;&gt;April&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi! I&#039;m sorry...since a lot of the stances of particular candidates were not clear to me, I created that page less with the particular candidate in mind, but more with long-standing party stances. This is especially true of the the third party candidates since I know next to nothing about them and didn&#039;t have time to do a ton of research. If you feel that I got one or two stances wrong, my advice is to use white out and fix it. If you feel that many of them are wrong, I also included a blank version of the table so kids can fill it out completely on their own. This would probably be preferable, buy my particular kids don&#039;t like writing and I didn&#039;t want them to hate the activity. <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f602.png" alt="😂" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />

It is so close to the election, I am not going to make any changes at this point, but if you want to share what you feel is wrong here on this thread, please go ahead. I know one reader shared that they did not feel Trump was pro-life. Also, somone thought it should say that he &quot;opposed expansion&quot; rather than flat out &quot;opposed&quot; in another spot. Hopefully when I update this in 4 years I will have time to give this more consideration and be able to incorporate reader feedback! I do want to be fair to all sides!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://researchparent.com/2024-u-s-presidential-election-lap-book/#comment-270630">April</a>.</p>
<p>Hi! I&#8217;m sorry&#8230;since a lot of the stances of particular candidates were not clear to me, I created that page less with the particular candidate in mind, but more with long-standing party stances. This is especially true of the the third party candidates since I know next to nothing about them and didn&#8217;t have time to do a ton of research. If you feel that I got one or two stances wrong, my advice is to use white out and fix it. If you feel that many of them are wrong, I also included a blank version of the table so kids can fill it out completely on their own. This would probably be preferable, buy my particular kids don&#8217;t like writing and I didn&#8217;t want them to hate the activity. 😂</p>
<p>It is so close to the election, I am not going to make any changes at this point, but if you want to share what you feel is wrong here on this thread, please go ahead. I know one reader shared that they did not feel Trump was pro-life. Also, somone thought it should say that he &#8220;opposed expansion&#8221; rather than flat out &#8220;opposed&#8221; in another spot. Hopefully when I update this in 4 years I will have time to give this more consideration and be able to incorporate reader feedback! I do want to be fair to all sides!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: April		</title>
		<link>https://researchparent.com/2024-u-s-presidential-election-lap-book/#comment-270630</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[April]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://researchparent.com/?p=26152#comment-270630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,
I had a quick question.  On the page that lists what they support and oppose, I&#039;m a little confused with the way that its listed.  It seems that support and oppose are in random places and don&#039;t seem to totally line up with their stances correctly.  Am I seeing it wrong?  Any help is appreciated, thank you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I had a quick question.  On the page that lists what they support and oppose, I&#8217;m a little confused with the way that its listed.  It seems that support and oppose are in random places and don&#8217;t seem to totally line up with their stances correctly.  Am I seeing it wrong?  Any help is appreciated, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 32/44 objects using APC
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: researchparent.com @ 2026-10-01 05:22:53 by W3 Total Cache
-->